Joint Affidavit of Corruption in the Massachusetts Judiciary
The undersigned [1], duly sworn plaintiffs in a civil suit dismissed both in summary judgment and on appeal, and denied "Further Appellate Review" (FAR) by the Supreme Judicial Court, herein present authenticated evidence showing that the state judiciary lies open to manipulation by government and corporate personages – a wrenching reality for whistle blowers whose private lives and fortunes have been sacrificed to privilege.
In 1999 we were rightly forewarned that influence trumps justice with impunity in the Commonwealth. Nonetheless in January 2000 we sued Commissioner of Education David Driscoll and Globe Senior VP Gregory Thornton along with four underlings for defaming us as incompetents, thieves, and child abusers. By dishonoring us the defendants sought as well to discredit our charges of fiscal fraud at a state charter school of which Thornton was trustees chairman.
A
concerted campaign of libel and slander against us began in earnest in
1997 – soon after we blew the whistle – and intensified in the wake of
a damning state audit instigated on our evidence of false enrollment
claims by the South Shore Charter School then of Hull, Massachusetts.
Published in May 1999, the State Auditor's comprehensive review of the
School's finances chronicled over $1 million in "undocumented [tuition]
billings" submitted to the state by CEO/Headmaster Timothy Anderson
during the first two years of operation. Predictably, the
charter-school moguls publicly denigrated Auditor Joseph DeNucci as
inept....
[1] David M. Beck, Hull MA, David L. Higgs, Weymouth MA and Rodney
W. Young, Hull MA.
For additional information about Corruption in the Massachusetts
Judiciary,
please e-mail courtcorruption@wellrock.net
Supreme
Judicial
Court Rule 3:07 Massachusetts Rules of Professional Conduct
RULE
8.3
REPORTING PROFESSIONAL
MISCONDUCT
(b) A lawyer having knowledge that a judge has committed a violation of applicable rules of judicial conduct that raises a substantial question as to the judge's fitness for office shall inform the Commission on Judicial Conduct.
Comment
[1] This rule requires lawyers to report serious violations of ethical duty by lawyers and judges. Even an apparently isolated violation may indicate a pattern of misconduct that only a disciplinary investigation can uncover.
Rule
3:09. CODE OF JUDICIAL CONDUCT
..A judge must make reasonable efforts, including the provision of appropriate supervision, to ensure that the general prohibition against ex parte communications is not violated through law clerks and other court personnel.
..a judge may not solicit non-record factual information from court personnel about a case and must take reasonable steps to avoid receiving unsolicited non-record factual information from them.
Section 3D: This Section requires judges to report conduct indicating a substantial likelihood of a serious violation of professional conduct by judges or lawyers together with the factual basis for this conclusion. Even an apparently isolated violation may indicate a pattern of misconduct that only a disciplinary investigation can uncover....
